|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Decision IX/21: Decommissioning of non-essential halon systems in non-Article 5 Parties
The Ninth Meeting of the Parties decided in Dec. IX/21: Noting that in its 1994 report, the Scientific Assessment Panel identified decommissioning and destruction of halon as the second most environmentally beneficial potential approach to further lowering stratospheric chlorine and bromine abundances but that the Technology and Economic Assessment Panel concluded that such an approach, while technically feasible, was not appropriate at that time, Noting that the Seventh Meeting of the Parties took action in relation to methyl bromide controls, which was the approach identified by the Scientific Assessment Panel as the most environmentally beneficial approach at that time, Noting also that Parties are considering further controls on methyl bromide, Recognizing that, since 1994, some Parties have taken action to decommission and commence destruction of non-essential halon, Recognizing that depletion of the ozone layer continues to be a significant environmental concern and that atmospheric concentrations of halons continue to increase, Recognizing that the Technology and Economic Assessment Panel is currently conducting an assessment of the availability of halons for critical uses under the terms of decision VIII/17,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| © Ozone Secretariat 2004 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||